Romanica Olomucensia 2014, 26(2):205-213 | DOI: 10.5507/ro.2014.021

Anáforas que dejan de serlo: de la interacción del discurso y la morfosintaxis

Antonio Fábregas

En la actualidad existe un debate acerca de si el nivel apropiado para estudiar las relaciones referenciales entre expresiones pronominales debería ser la morfosintaxis o un nivel pragmático-discursivo. Este trabajo se plantea esta pregunta mediante el estudio de una serie de casos donde el sentido referencial de un pronombre es alterado discursivamente con independencia de sus rasgos morfosintácticos. Entre las conclusiones destaca que la morfosintaxis es necesaria para explicar la desaparición de interpretaciones discursivas que, de otra manera, deberían ser posibles, pero que, en las estructuras posibles, la interpretación que reciben los pronombres está determinada por factores discursivos.

Palabras clave: expresiones anafóricas; pronombres; clíticos; discurso; cambio de referencia.

Anaphoras that stop being anaphoras: on the interaction between discourse and morphosyntax

There is a debate about whether the appropriate level to study referential relations between pronominal expressions should be morphosyntactic or discursive. This article explores the issue through a study of some cases where the referential sense of a pronoun does not correspond to its morphosyntactic endowment. It is concluded that morphosyntax is necessary to ban otherwise possible discursive construals, but that - in possible structures - the interpretation received by pronouns is determined by discursive factors

Keywords: anaphoric expressions; pronouns; clitics; discourse; reference shift.

Published: December 1, 2014  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Fábregas A. Anaphoras that stop being anaphoras: on the interaction between discourse and morphosyntax. Romanica Olomucensia. 2014;26(2):205-213. doi: 10.5507/ro.2014.021.
Download citation

References

  1. Chomsky, Noam (1981), Lectures on government and binding, Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
  2. Frazier, Lyn - Clifton, Charles Jr. (1996), Construal, Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press.
  3. Gernsbacher, Morton Ann - Hargreaves, David J. (1988), "Accessing sentence participants: the advantage of first mention", Journal of memory and language 27 (6), 699-717. Go to original source...
  4. Givón, Talmy (1983), Topic continuity in discourse: a quantitative cross-language study, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  5. Hemforth, Barbara - Colonna, Savéria - Pynte, Jöel - Konieczny, Lars (2004), "Pronoun resolution across languages", 10th Annual Conference on Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing (AmLap).
  6. Järviki, Juhani - van Gompel, Roger P. G - Hyönä, Jukka - Bertram, Raymond (2005), "Ambiguous pronoun resolution: contrasting the first-mention and subject-preference accounts", Psychological science 16 (4), 260-264. Go to original source...
  7. Kehler, Andrew (2002), Coherence, reference and the theory of grammar. Stanford: CSLI.
  8. Reinhart, Tanya - Reuland, Eric (1993), "Reflexivity", Linguistic Inquiry 24, 657-720.
  9. Reuland, Eric (2011), Anaphora and language design, Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press. Go to original source...
  10. Rooryck, Johan - Vanden Wyngaerd, Guido (2007), "The syntax of spatial anaphora", Nordlyd 34(2), 33-85. Go to original source...
  11. Sanders, Ted J. M. (1997), "Semantic and pragmatic sources of coherence. On the categorization of coherence relations in context", Discourse Processes 24, 119-147. Go to original source...
  12. Thornton, Robert - Gil, Mariela - MacDonald, Maryellen C. (1998), "Accounting for crosslinguistic variation: a constraint-based perspective", in: Hillert, Dieter (ed.), Syntax and semantics: a crosslinguistic perspective, New York: Academic Press, 211-225. Go to original source...